Angel
Registered: January 2008
Posts: 37
|
|
Fri February 15, 2008 10:50
|
Rating: 1.00
|
|
|
|
Angel
Registered: January 2008
Posts: 37
|
|
Fri February 15, 2008 10:51
|
|
|
I realise I am not educated in these dogs but it looks like any ferral street mutt I see in the city.
|
|
MBA
Registered: July 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 20
|
|
Fri February 15, 2008 22:10
|
Rating: 10.00
|
|
Well part correct, A your education is based on man made breeds that are selected to look exactly alike. This cookie cutter ness is the reason we are now losing our breeds today to serious genetic issues.
Feral I would say in part yes landrace breeds were not bred by AI"s or by selecting a pretty stud dog it was working dogs breed at will.
Mutt in todays standards yes, they would not be a breed since they are not separated yet into variations based on color or hair type.
The only part wrong is street these dogs were bred in most ancient times long before streets or cities existed.
Give me a dog or line or breed that lives 17 years works till the day it dies and does not have genetic disease that requirs tons ot tests to replace natural selectio- the strongest survive.
Some of the original Dogos look NOTHING like the counterpart Champion show dogs today.
|
|
Angel
Registered: January 2008
Posts: 37
|
|
Sun February 17, 2008 06:12
|
|
|
The angulation is poor on that dog. He is not structurally sound.
It has nothing to do with pure breed or not.
I dont think that dogs build helps him to push off the rear end.
Perhaps he was a good worker but his structure says other wise.
------------------------
By the way my male dogo looks very much the same as dogos from the 30's.
Check it out here:
Some breeders might be breeding Giant Dogos but Tim Parr has good solid dogs up to standard. Original Standard!...lol
|
|
